Truth be told, I have a lot (and makes it a lot) reason to complain this test, but at least in proj

The IBFC to punish this or that concurseiro indignantly denounced that the general mess that occurred at various polling places, but the same "institute" was responsible for the breach lite shipping schedule of the notice. Let's look?
In the announcement, item 7.25.1 says: "The candidate, while performing the test, is found carrying any of the objects specified in subsection 7:24, including electronics lite shipping schedule cited, even if disconnected, will be automatically deleted Public Contest".
But wait! The overwhelming majority of local test cell were, by permission of the own tax IBFC in can of their owners. To protect them was only provided lite shipping schedule a clear plastic lite shipping schedule bag, unsealed and in most cases there was no guidance to remove the battery.
Already in item 7.25. expressed the edict: "Cell phone, radio communicator and electronics candidates, while in the test room must remain off, having its battery removed, being accommodated in local tax to be appointed by the evidence room."
This entry was posted on 0, 10 \ 10 \ UTC December \ 10 \ UTC 2013 at 23:41 and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Post navigation Previous Post Next Post
7 The lack of item selection announcement, important for candidates - two issues of some items of the notice and no other, significant.
a) traditional, renewing progressita, not renewing policy b) traditional, not renewing policy, renewing progressita c) not renewing policy, traditional, refreshing progressita d) renewing lite shipping schedule progressita traditional lite shipping schedule progressita not renewing
The worst thing is that people who are preparing faced a "junk" proof of such. My disappointment is immense, for all the inconvenience that this evidence led us. This has to be revised!
Thanks Well, it seems she does not even know it was "S" or "VIEW" is her belly button thinking and talking, rsrsrsrs.
I'm sorry, but that's what traveling is ... It's obvious that it was just a typo, because if the "view" (almost another word) was not a typo, but spelling !!! It is obvious that the word is "Progressive" than "progressivist" not ???
I AGREE WITH RESPECT TO AFFIRM THAT VC is a typo. VC BUT ALREADY VERIFIED AS 20 MORE ISSUES BEYOND THE ERROR ENTRY ARE ERRORS lite shipping schedule OF AGREEMENT very serious, REGENCY, Accent, SCORE AND SEMANTICS? OR DO NOT COME IN SAYING THAT ALSO AGREE WITH THE JIG OF ISSUE 4) OF PORTUGUESE! !!! BRAVO VC IS FIT FOR THE POST OF TEACHER SEDF. CONGRATULATIONS !!! NOT POOR!
It is true! ... Who studied realized very clearly lite shipping schedule that this was the trend PROGRESSIVE !!! Now, those people who did not have the knowledge to discern the question really lite shipping schedule is hard!
but we can not stay in the world ...... guesses the word had to be clearly and explicitly correct. Do not have to waste time wondering if the word is this or that. They are very well paid to prepare the evidence and what we saw was a copy error with internet and all, lack of respect and professionalism.
I have not seen any irregularity in my room at the entrance of IESB.Fomos oriented to remove the battery from the cell room, the clock and put inside a saco.O same should lite shipping schedule be placed underneath the chair. I have attended other contests lite shipping schedule and guidelines were the same,
In the room who took the test agents were also quite clear on the guidelines of what to do with cell phones, and during the race still warned candidates who were looking around that could be declassified. Proof in CEUB did not hear any complaints either.
Truth be told, I have a lot (and makes it a lot) reason to complain this test, but at least in projection Wansbeck was asked for candidates to disassociate the cell and subsequently (reaffirming later) withdraw the battery of mobile phones in their possession. Soon after came a general coordinator who went from room to room reaffirm the general notices stating that starting from that moment who was found with any thing that was not allowed in public notice would be eliminated.
If acts like concursando, what action will the case go and find a student (or a group of students) wanting to do in a time of turmoil proof? Allow and repeat what you did during class; or curb and do what IBFC did not?
Truth be told, do not want to live with the truth, living with the lie (or illusion). I did not come here to help or hinder came here to speak the truth. I signed an act to be the first in a row near the chair on