The expansion of the Alcântara Container porto di trieste Terminal and its transformation into a deep-sea port is the response to the need to increase the competitiveness of the national port system, particularly the Port of Lisbon, promoting economic development and creating jobs in the country and the region. Do not extend the TCA is to opt for stagnation an infrastructure porto di trieste that generates 140,000 jobs and represents about 2% of GDP and National 5% of GDP in the Lisbon area Evale Tagus. And in ports stagnation means wasting and this means unemployment. At a time of crisis, but in the port movement of containers at national level has had in the first months of 2010 an annual recovery of over 20%, we would be betting on the annulment of the Port of Lisbon, which had, in 2009, a behavior more favorable than Barcelona, Bilbao and Vigo.
It is a solution that is mainly based on private investment, easing the state's investment effort. 227 million in private investment. It is a legal solution, as evidenced by the opinions of the Harbour Institute and Maritime Transport and APL, which the Court does not question.
It is the solution that best defends the public interest, as shown by the study for APL by a state independent entity. It is that which corresponds to a higher value added Net for the state. It is a solution that respects the Community framework and to set policy for the sector. The proposals of the CFP and the ENP, for example, undermine and contradict all consolidated port policy in recent years in Portugal, the rest of Europe and the world. The TCA managed by direct administration of APL, causing a contractual break either with customers or with workers here would have the harbinger of death.
What is at stake is not only become larger terminal, is to give conditions porto di trieste to receive the most modern ships of much greater capacity, and this requires more front pier, deeper water and more efficient stowage. And not worth walk with subverted porto di trieste accounts on installed or available capacity. Let us remember what happened in 2003, when after a spike in traffic followed a sharp downturn because of the crowded terminal, followed by the announcement of its deactivation, as reported in news at the time. But do gentlemen, what are the media, only retain what gives them that? If it did not know that the City of Lisbon, with a demanding but rational stance, reached an agreement with PPA and Liscont allowing optimize the size and terminal volume, safeguarding the sights, as indeed is now being proposed by CDS, but, more than that, reducing the container area near the Gare Maritime de Alcântara and allocating it to the enjoyment of citizens porto di trieste and reducing the impact on road traffic in the surrounding area. Opening and spirit of negotiation at the service porto di trieste of citizens, finding a balance between quality of life and economic development and employment. Not worth V.Exas come now propose what is already poured into a written agreement between the parties! porto di trieste But V.Exas could also read the contradictory presented by the Minister of State and Finance and the then Minister of Public Works. Then they would know that is not true what is said about the amounts of investment porto di trieste and the division between public and private. The total investment is 345 million euros and 227 million private component, that is, 66% of the total. The 405 million total investment that have been mentioned include 60 million related to the direct link between the railway line and the waist line of Cascais, which will benefit more than half a million people and has nothing to do with the terminal, allowing, for example, direct connection of Cascais or Oeiras to the New Lisbon Airport or the North of the country. They would know that the distribution of market risk includes an upside of 80% in favor of APL and the risk matrix was not changed porto di trieste globally and, in addition, APL does not guarantee the utility profits. But I ask the attention of V.Exas to the following: "I have the honor to inform Your Excellency that, in the above-identified process, by not showing any offenses or other financial irregularities or who imports know, within the jurisdiction of this Court, understood the prosecution not trigger any court procedure. "This is the letter of the text of the Court of Auditors on the Audit of the TCA, addressed to the then Minister of Public Works, Transport and Communications on 13 October 2009, on following the last of the three elections that took place last year, I ask the Bureau to send distribute the other stands. All the rest are opinions! 4 - grievous consequences Mr President, ladies porto di trieste and gentlemen; Approve this
No comments:
Post a Comment